The Adams Archive

Capitalism on Trial: The Federal Reserve, Fractional Banking, and the Silicon Valley Bank Collapse

Welcome to the Adams Archive, where the unspoken truths of society are uncovered and explored with passion and precision. Host Austin Adams dives deep into controversial topics that will make you question the very fabric of our world. In this groundbreaking episode, Austin investigates the American banking system and its unnerving implications for the future of the nation. Delve into the intricacies of fractional banking and discover how this seemingly innocuous concept has evolved into a far more sinister reality.
Austin takes listeners on an intellectual journey that starts with the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and leads to an examination of the Federal Reserve. With the aid of Edward Griffin's "The Creature from Jekyll Island," the podcast unravels the complex history and mechanisms behind modern banking practices that affect every aspect of our lives. As Austin navigates this labyrinth of information, he pursues an interview with Griffin himself to provide even greater insight into the hidden world of banking.
If you're ready for a mind-blowing exploration of the financial system and its consequences, join Austin Adams in the Adams Archive for this eye-opening episode. Subscribe, leave a five-star review, and share your thoughts on this crucial issue. Find additional resources, articles, and videos at austinadams.subs.com, and prepare to have your perspective transformed. The Adams Archive is more than just a podcast; it's an invitation to challenge the status quo and uncover the astonishing truth about the world around us.
Join the substack, follow our social media and more at https://linktr.ee/theaustinjadams
 
Full Transcription:
 Hello, you bu to full people. My name is Austin Adams, and welcome to the Adams Archive. Today's episode is going to absolutely blow your mind. I have been diving deep into this topic over the past several, several days, and I can tell you I have never been more concerned for the future of America as I am now.
Now, this is not about trafficking. This is not about politicians. This is not about, this is about the American banking system. Okay? Now, that may not sound very enticing to you, but once we get into this topic to the depths that we are going to today, You're gonna realize what I'm talking about. Okay. Now, what prompted this for me was looking into the Silicon Valley Bank collapsing.
Okay? Now, that prompted me to figure out what the hell fractional banking is Figuring out fractional banking led me to realize that that is no longer the concept that we operate off of. No matter how scary fractional banking itself is, what we have today is even worse. Now. That drove me down a rabbit hole to figure out how we got to a point where fractional banking was even possible, which led me to learn all about the Federal Reserve, to learn about the Federal Reserve.
There was a book that was written, and we will go over some of the highlights called The Creature from Jekyll Island. . Okay, now, that book beautifully written, um, there's some really good, uh, really, really good, uh, lectures online by, uh, Edward Griffin, and I'm gonna see if I can get him on the podcast. I messaged him today to see if, uh, maybe he can come on here and explain these things a little bit better than I can.
But he's very, very brilliant. You should go listen to these lectures. They'll be included in the ck All right. If you're not in the CK already, go to austin adams.subs.com. You can sign up, you'll get all the articles, all the videos, all of the ish that we are talking about here today. All right. So without further a.
Well maybe wanna do subscribe? , leave a five star review. All right. Tell me what you like about the podcast. Tell me what you learned about, uh, fractional banking, which again, doesn't sound very enticing, but promise you after you figure out everything that I figured out, your mind's gonna be blown. All right, so without further ado, let's jump into.
The Adams Archive, the very first subject to today's podcast is going to be on the collapse of S V B. Okay, now, SVB is the Silicon Valley Bank. Silicon Valley Bank, obviously located in Silicon Valley, basically sent shockwaves through the entire tech industry. And that was right about a week ago, right? A few, not even a few days ago.
All right. Through Wall Street, through Washington, everybody was shocked by what happens. Regulators have since shut down the bank to prevent a crisis in the broader banking system. Just days after another bank, signature bank was abruptly closed as well. Silicon Valley Bank, which provided banking services to nearly half of the country's venture capital backed technology and life science companies made this very the same mistake as many other banks.
It invested most of its deposits in long-term debt like treasury bonds, promising steady, modest returns. However, the strategy proved shortsighted when the Federal Reserve looking to combat rapid inflation, started raising interest rates, making these once safe investments, far less attractive. All right.
Silicon Valley Bank was also el uh, uniquely vulnerable due to its business being concentrated in the tech industry, which was experiencing a rapid decline in startup funding. As a result, its clients started to withdraw their money, and once some people started drawing their money, other people started withdrawing their money causing what they call a bank run.
All right, now a bank run, so you have some terminology behind this. A bank run is basically when everybody starts to go line up outside of the banks, asking banks to give them the very money that they worked so hard for, the very money that they sweat bled, worked their asses off weekends over time to feed their children.
Okay? And we'll learn about that fractional banking, which some of this has already alluded to already, which is terrifying, like I said. Okay, so now the collapse of Silicon Bank is the largest, since the 2008 financial crisis, the very largest bank to do so since. , which again, is only gonna get worse as people realize that our banking system is built on a house of cards.
Just a little whistle in the wind will cause our entire financial system to collapse. All right, we're gonna talk about today some things like what is money, right? Why is it even hold value? Which is probably the most fundamental question that has one of the most concerning answers. Um, as you've noticed recently, I've been using the AI chatbot chat.
G p T pretty consistently came out with their fourth generation of it today. Um, it's pretty incredible technology, but it helped me along the way doing some of these calculations to actually figure out what it would cause for the American financial system to collapse. And that's some of the things that we're gonna discuss here today.
I'll go through those calculations with you. All right. It highlights the dangers of fractional reserve banking. When banks invest most of their deposits, they create more money than they hold in reserves, leading to a precarious situation where a loss of faith in the bank can trigger a run on deposits.
In such cases, the bank makes gains privately, but losses are socially distributed. That's what you have to realize about this. When a bank is doing well, they profit ungodly amounts of money. When things aren't going well for a bank, you know who foots the bill? You and me, the American public foots the bill when they get bailed out by our government.
So things are going great. They profit, you'll make a dollar. Well, maybe you make, you know, 2 cents off of every a hundred dollars that you have in your bank account based on interest. But when things are going great for the banks, they're not coming to you to pay you out dividends, right? But when things are going horribly bad,  and the government decides to bail them out.
You know who pays that bill? And we don't even really pay it. And that's what I've realized from learning all of this. We don't even really pay it. We pay it through inflation. We pay it through the fictitious magical creation of money, which has no value unless we decide that it does again, which we'll talk about in a minute.
So fractional Reserve banking to me is theft. It is a entity taking your money and putting it in as many places as possible so that they can continue to make money. They can give out loans with it. They can do all of these things, but the second you come ask for your money, while you and maybe your neighbor and a few other people at the same time, they don't have it.
Cuz it's often these fictitious little places that they're hoping to make interest based on the fact that you're never gonna come ask them for it. At the same time. Right before the Great Depression, the US dollar was backed by gold. That ensured that the money in the economy was backed by something physical, something tangible, right?
When something is backed by something, a commodity like gold or silver, right? Or even Bitcoin, right? If you understand how this works, right, the, the way that gold is created, gold is a, gold is a specific element that is created. And forgive me, I'm not a damn science teacher over here. Got a beer in my Yeti.
So
the way that gold is created is the earth puts together certain amounts of carbon. And when you get the perfect alignment of these, these elements, right? It creates what we know today is gold, right? Not fool's gold. Not all these other renditions of this potential possibility, but actual physical gold as we know it today, is a specific type of gold.
Okay. Now that gold is minted, right? The, the earth had to have all of these situations happen simultaneously and in the proper way perfectly to cause gold to be created and to be in your hand the way that it can be today. Okay? That's what happens, right? The, the, the earth has a mathematical equation of circumstances and pressure and whatever the hell else it is, and then gold is physically created and minted by the earth.
Okay? Something like, think of it, if you know anything about cryptocurrency, think of it like Bitcoin, right? Bitcoin ha has a computer that is working nonstop to create a bunch of algorithms and calculations to try to decrypt a or or mine a Bitcoin, the same way you mine gold. And eventually, after so many algorithms, so many computers are working to do this, one unlocks a Bitcoin and that creates scarcity.
There's only a certain amount of bitcoins that are being created on a general basis. There's only a certain amount of gold that is being. By the earth at any given time, that scarcity gives it value, right? So during the Great Depression, our money was backed by gold. After the depression, the US abandoned the gold standard and became a fiat system.
Okay? Fiat currency is not backed by anything at all. No assets, no commodities, right? And the fact that Silicon Valley Bank had basically uninsured depositors highlights the need for money to be backed by something physical like gold. And that ensures that depositors money is protected. It is being held physically somewhere to show that that piece of paper that you have is attached to a certain amount of, of physical minted developed by the earth gold or even Bitcoin, right?
It has some sort of, of, of, uh, built-in scarcity.  that drives value, right? There's not, there's not an unlimited amount that can be created at the whim of any American who wants to profit based off the central banking system, which again, we'll learn more about in a minute. We're gonna learn a lot today. Um, the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank underscores the need for tighter banking regulations, right?
We've seen several, several things that have happened, right? Like, um, some regulations that were rolled back in 2018 under Donald Trump, right? Some banking experts believed that Dodd-Frank Financial regulatory package intended to prevent such collapses and could have stopped this bank from handling its interest rate risks, um, had it not been rolled back, which is some opinions, but the bigger problem, the biggest issue.
When we talk about fractional banking, which again, I'll pull up here. Let, I'll, I'll talk you through it. Lemme just go through this article with you. The collapse of these banks that says has prompted a swift reevaluation of the Fed's interest rate increases. On Monday. Smaller banks rushed to en reassure customers that they were on firmer financial footing, but shares of US regional banks plummeted.
The b W Bank Index, which tracks the performance of 24 major banks, fell 10%, erasing nearly 200 billion of value of the banks. In the index, it says, the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank in Signature Bank highlights the dangers of fractional reserve banking and the need for money to be backed by something physical.
The follow of these collapses underscores the need for tighter banking regulations to prevent such collapses and ensure the stability of the financial system. Okay, let's talk about it. What is fractional banking? Okay. Fractional banking was the cause of what happened with svb. Right. What is fractional banking?
Fractional banking is the idea that if you deposit a hundred dollars into a bank, the bank can take $90 of that 100. Hold onto the remaining 10, which was the standard prior to 2020. The standard prior to 2020 was that the banking system had to hold 10% of the overall val value in reserves. Now, that changed, but even with 10%, think of it this way, if you handed the, gave the bank 10 a hundred dollars, right?
Let's say 10 people gave the bank a hundred dollars, right? They gave out 900 of that thousand dollars. Of the 10 people's a hundred dollars, which leaves them with one $100 bill. The other 900 they gave away to other people in the hopes of making interest in the future. So when two people, just two people go to the bank at the same time and say, I want my a hundred dollars.
give me all of my $100 that I gave you. That is $200 that they're asking for. One of those people is not getting any of their money, or at least both of them are getting half of it. They don't have it. They don't even have it for two people, let alone the full 10 people that gave 'em a hundred dollars.
Right? If just two people went and asked the bank for this money back, they would not be able to do it, right? 20% in this case. Now what we realize, it is far, far worse than that. In the real world scenario.
What we realize, excuse me. What we realized is that in 2020 it was changed from 10%. Just 10% of the money in your banks had to be held onto by the, by the reserves, by the bank, just 10%. In 2020. During Covid, they changed that percentage. To 0%. None of it did they have to hold onto none of it in reserves.
0%. Not 1%, not 2%. 0% of your money has to be held by the bank in reserves. 0%. That is astonishing. There is no federal regulations at all now that say that the bank has to hold any of your money for withdraws. Right. What they are dependent on is if everything collapses, then the F D I C, the Federal Something Insurance Commission, will basically has insured each each value of each customer up to $250,000, which again, we'll find out, is a complete farce.
What a terrible word. Farce is a terrible word. It's like, I don't even like to say it. It's like saying fart farce. I don't know. Anyways, FARs is a complete, FARs is bullshit. There's nothing there for you to take in. So, so when two of those people in that scenario that I gave you, go to the bank and ask for their money back, and somebody's going to walk away with no money, so, so one person gets their a hundred dollars out, the second person goes and asks for 10 of it, just 10 of it.
Now that person realizes that the bank does not have their money. They start talking to their friends, you know who their friends are. The other eight people in this scenario who gave the bank a hundred dollars. Now you have all other eight people, nine people in total going to the bank saying, I want my money back.
But the bank has none of it. They don't have to hold onto any of it. And the scenario is actually far worse than that in today's world. After 2020 and that legislation changed. The scenario is now anybody goes to the bank and starts to ask them for that money back. They don't have to hold onto any of it.
That my friends is fractional banking. And it scares the shit outta me, and it's not even fractional anymore. There's no fraction. The fraction's gone. It's fictitious banking. That's what it is. It's no longer even fractional, which was horrible. It's far, far worse. Okay. Do you wanna know how fragile our entire banking system is here in the United States?
Here is the most terrifying thing that you will hear today. Okay. Chat, G P t concluded that if 2% of Americans, 2% of Americans decided to withdraw their money from the bank, at the same time, it could have a high potential of causing a collapse of the entire banking system that as we know it today, the entire banking system as we know it today, just 2%, two out of a hundred people, two out of a hundred people went to their bank right now.
This concluded and calculated. The entire banking system could collapse. So again, it's far worse than that scenario that I gave you and let me walk you through how it got to that. Okay. Chat. G p T said we can try to make a rough estimation based on some data points. Okay. Now I had to do some finagling to give, actually give me this cuz I didn't wanna gimme this answer.
It says, first it's essential to understand that the reserve requirement being 0% means that banks are not required to hold a specific percentage of their deposits as reserved. However, it doesn't mean the banks hold no reserves at all, right? They still maintain some reserves. Doesn't give you an amount cause it can't, to manage day-to-day transactions and withdrawals day to day, not week to week, not month to month, day-to-day.
The amount of their reserves varies by bank. It depends on the bank size, number of clients, and other factors. To estimate the percentage of people required to cause a nationwide banking collapse, we need to consider the amount of money held in deposits and the amount of reserves held by banks.
According to the Federal Reserve, as of September, 2021, the total amount of money in the deposits in the US banks was around 17 trillion.
Okay. Assuming that these banks still maintain some reserves, assuming that they maintain some reserves, it says, let's calculate, based on 2% of their deposits are held as reserves. This would amount to approximately 342 billion in reserves. If depositors were to withdraw their money in such a way that bank reserves were insufficient to cover the withdrawals, it could potentially trigger a banking collapse, right?
That's the other eight people, nine people going to the bank and saying, I want my money, because the other, the second person went there to ask for it, and it wasn't there to find the percentage of people who would neither withdraw their funds to cause a banking collapse. We can use the following formula.
Reserves divided by deposits times 100 equals the percentage of people. Okay, so we take that 342 billion, right of the 2% seven. Divide that by the 17.1 trillion. Multiply that by 100, it gives you 2%. It says, based on this rough estimation, if around 2% of people in the United States simultaneously withdrew their their money from the banks, it could potentially cause a nationwide banking collapse.
Says, however, this is a highly simplified calculation. Does not take into account many factors such as the variation in reserve levels among the banks, the distribution of deposits, and the possibility of banks borrowing money from other sources to cover withdrawals. Additionally, the Federal Reserve Act as a lender of last resort and can provide emergency funds to banks facing a liquidity prices which could prevent a collapse.
Okay? Now what it goes on to say is that in summary, it's difficult to provide a precise percentage of people required to cause a nationwide banking collapse due to 0% fractional reserve requirements. However, based on this rough estimation of 2% of people with through their funds, it could cause a banking crisis.
Um, it says that reme to remember that the Federal Reserve could intervene to prevent a collapse. Oh, don't, don't worry about anything. The Federal Reserve is here to save you. It's not gonna collapse when the Federal Reserve is here. What is the government's got our back. Hmm. Is the Federal Reserve a part of the government?
No, it is not. It's a mixture being overseen in some way, shape, or form by Congress. But we even find out that that's not true. But it was, and you can read all about this in the Creature from JE Island, but we're gonna get into it now. Okay. The Federal Reserve has absolutely nothing, was not founded by the government.
You want to know who the, the Federal Reserve was founded by? The Federal Reserve was founded by bankers, the very bankers that you know the name of, and you can probably take a guess as to who people from the Rockefeller family. Aldrich family, JP Morgan Chase. Seven men secretly met on an island in Georgia, concealing their identities, changing their names.
They met on a private train cart to discuss how they were going to essentially take over the world's banking systems, starting with the United States. These seven men's wealth, seven men's wealth equated to one fourth of the Total World's wealth at the time, and all they wanted to do was figure out how they could take over the other three fourths.
It's pretty simple. When you get seven guys in the room, why wouldn't you do that? Right?
So let's unmask the architects of the Federal Reserve. And talk about why every single American should be outraged at this historical account. And here it is. As you go about your daily life, there's a creature lurking behind the scenes polling the strings of our economy. This seemingly innocuous entity is none other than the Federal Reserve and its origin story is as chilling as any horror tale when you realize the truth In the eye-opening book, the Creature from Jekyll Island by Edward Griffin, it unveils the clandestine beginnings of the Fed in the dangers it poses to our society.
The secret birth of the Federal Reserve in 1910, a group of influential bankers in 1910 and politicians gathered in secrecy on JE Island in Georgia to hatch a plan that would forever change the course of American history. Their mission. To create a centralized banking system that would benefit their own, their own interests, while consolidating power and control over the nation's finances.
This figurative meeting laid the groundwork for the creation of the Federal Reserve. In 1913, our entire structural financial system was built less than 111 years ago. An institution that now, now holds immense power and sway over our economy basically dictates all of it. The key architects or the Federal Reserve were no ordinary individuals.
They were powerful cabal of bankers and politicians, including Paul Warberg, Nelson Aldrich, JP Morgan, among others. Their goal was to establish a banking cartel that would protect their interests while simultaneously controlling the country's monetary policy. By doing so, they could manipulate the economy to their advantage.
Profiting from booms and bus while leaving ordinary Americans to bear the consequences. The Federal Reserve's very existence poses a threat to our society. Its power to 
create money out of thin air and manipulate interest rates, allows it to control the value of our currency, often leading to inflation and devaluation.
Moreover, the Fed's unelected the Fed's unelected officials operate with minimal transparency, making decisions that affect millions and millions of people without any public oversight whatsoever. Furthermore, the Federal Reserve's ability to bail out large financial institutions in times of crisis promotes moral hazard.
Big banks take on excessive risks knowing that the Federal Reserve will rescue them if things go south, which is exactly what we saw happened with S V B. This reckless. This reckless behavior can lead to financial crisises with ordinary citizens left to foot the bill, which is exactly what I talked about earlier, right?
When they can create money out of thin air, it's not out of thin air, it's out of future comfortability for the American people. It causes inflation, and that's where we're gonna see the result when they created trillions of dollars during covid so that they could pay people not to work, so they could shut down the economy for their own agenda to cause you to get vaccinated so Pfizer could profit off of it.
Now, the Federal Reserve born from a secretive gathering of powerful elites wields enormous power over our economy. Its actions can lead to inflation, devaluation, financial crisises, all while operating with minimal transparency.
It says, as Americans, we must be aware of the Fed's origins and inherent risk opposes to our society. We should demand greater transparency, oversight, de, and democratic control over this powerful institution. It's time for us to stand up and fight against the creature that has taken a hold of our economy before it's too late.
And I personally believe that it might already be too late. Okay. It is so crazy to see how this came together and what, what this entire financial system is built on. Like I said, it's a house of cards. Okay. Let's go ahead and let's watch a little bit of this clip. And this is by the author  📍 himself, Edward Griffin.
Um, who again, I really hope I can get on the show cause I would have a really, really interesting conversation with him here. It's takes 
 in in taxes. How can Congress spend more money than its income in taxes? Basically what happens is the Congress goes down to the. And asks for, let's say it's a billion dollars more that they need this day.
And the treasury official says, you guys gotta be kidding. We don't have any money here. You spent it all long ago. Everything we've taken in taxes is long spent. And Congress says, well, we kind of figured that was the case, but we thought somebody might have dropped by and left some money. . They said, we know what we'll do.
We'll borrow the rest of it. So they go down the street to the printing office. Now notice they're not gonna print money. They're going to print certificates, nice big fancy certificates with borders on the corner, and an eagle at the top and a seal at the bottom. And it'll say, United States Treasury Bond or Note or Bill, depending on the length of maturity.
And it's so impressive. It almost looks like money, but if you hold it up, the light, it really says, I owe you. That's all they are. . And so Congress takes it and it wants the public to step forward and loan the money in exchange for the IUs. Sometimes that's called buying bonds. No, you're not buying anything.
You're loaning money to the government and getting an i u in return. And a lot of people in the private sector and the institutions are anxious to loan money to the government. Why? Because they have heard that it's the best investment you can possibly make the most secure investment because it is backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government
And that people aren't quite sure what that means, but it sure sounds good. And so they lend the money. Well just in, in case there's anyone here in doubt as to what that means, I'd like to explain it to you. The full faith and credit of the United States government means that the federal government solemnly promises to pay you back your money plus interest.
If it has to take everything you've got in the form of taxes to do it, it will do it
It's a promise to tax you, and people don't think this thing through. They think, oh, it's wonderful. It's a, it's a, you know, wonderful investment and I'm gonna get some of my money back. Yeah. Anyway, that's a little side issue. The government is able to borrow a tremendous amount of money, and therefore spend more than it takes in, in taxes through this process, but never enough.
They always need more than that. Not to worry, they say they walk further down the street to the Federal Reserve building. Now the Fed has been waiting for them. That's one of the reasons it was created. And they walk in there and the Federal Reserve officer opens up his desk drawer, pulls out a big checkbook, and he writes a check to the United States Treasury for $1 billion and hands it to them.
Now, he need to stop and ask a question, where did they get that money? That billion dollars. That's a lot of money. Who put the money in into that? Into that account for the Federal Reserve so they could give it to Congress or to the Treasury. And the answer is, there is no money there. There's absolutely zero.
There's just a checkbook. Well, if you and I were to do that, we would go to jail. But they can do it because Congress wants them to do it. This, in fact, is the payoff. This is the benefit to the government for being in the partnership. The government can go to the Federal Reserve and. Obtain instant amounts of any amount of money they want without having to confront the taxpayer and say, we're gonna raise your taxes for this money directly.
It would be very unpopular if Congress had to go to the public and say, you know, we have a lot of money we want to take from you folks, and it's gonna cost you $3,000 per family more than it did last year. You know how long they'd last in office. So they like this mandrake mechanism very well. The public doesn't know that it's costing them anything, it's just how it works somehow.
So this money, this billion dollars springs into being precisely at the instant that the Federal Reserve officer signs the check and gives it to the government. Now, let's see where the banking cartel benefits from this partnership. 
 So there is your answer about where our money comes from. It. Comes from nowhere.
Nowhere. It is fictitiously created by the Federal Reserve. There is no backing whatsoever. There is no scarcity or a commodity. You may know this, but you may not have heard it in this way. The American dollar is an illusion that only continues to thrive as long as everybody believes in it. What happens to the dollar?
Once every, the illusion crumbles. Once people lose faith in it, and they go to the banks and start asking for their money back, it doesn't exist. Right? More checks need to be written, which just kicks the can down the road, and when you kick the can down the road, right? That causes inflation, that devalues our dollar, right?
So there's a little bit about where the money comes from. It comes from nowhere. These seven bankers gave themselves the power to be financial gods with the ability to create money out of thin air and then foot the back, the bill back to us, the American citizens.
Okay, now you must say there must be some oversight, right? This is a, it has the word federal in it. No way. They just do whatever they want right now, the way that they lay it out and the way the structure was built. And there's been hundreds of amendments since this happened in 1913, which make it far, far worse than they was even originally written to do.
but there's 12 regional banks. Now, these banks are not banks like you and I have access to, right? They're corporate banks. They're governmental banking structures, right? So they say that they, they push off this power, and there's 12 regional banks that make up the, the banks that all that hold the power over, uh, hold the power over the Federal Reserve.
But what you find out is that's not the case either. There's loopholes built into the laws that allow these federal banks, these 12 banks, based on districts that are drawn up arbitrarily, that only have power to the extent that the Federal Reserve allows them to have power by this committee that oversees everything, right?
This committee that oversees everything has the power to veto any and all things. The only thing that the regional banks actually have any power over is the interest rates for their specific districts. But you even find out.  that these regional banks can be vetoed in their own percentages of interest rates for their own districts by this overhead and oversight committee.
So it is not immune to any type of corruption as some people would have you believe. It's basically built off of corruption, right? They get to create money however they want, whenever they want, for whatever reason they want. As we found out with Ukraine, the Federal Reserve is just a, like he said, a cartel built by the banks to become a monopoly over the financial system.
Over our government, the banks are not owned by the government. The government is owned by the banks, and the more that you realize, the more that you read up on our financial systems, the more you learn about it, the more that becomes the case.  because the banks own the companies, right? You look at BlackRock, you look at Bla, Vanguard, those d different conglomerations of of financial wealth funds own every single major corporation.
Those corporations lobby the government and get politicians put into positions so they can continue to further the profitability of the entities in which the corporations want. Right? The, the corporations are right. The only, the only legislation that is being passed is stuff that's profitable for these corporations, and the only things that are profitable for the corporations are what's profitable for companies like BlackRock.
BlackRock, or entities like BlackRock, not even companies and entities like Vanguard, and they have worldwide reach. Those are the banking cartels, right? Everybody wants to pull back the curtain. That's the World Economic Forum elites. So then you can start to ask yourself, well, why? Why would they wanna do these things?
Right? We'll get to that in just a second, but let's ask ourselves a more simple question. Why does money have any value if it is not backed by something of scarcity? If it's not need to be minted by the earth, if there's no actual true scarcity surrounding it, why does it hold any value at all? The only reason that money has any value whatsoever is because it's an agreed upon illusion that all of us buy into when the illusion fades, so does our entire societal financial foundation.
The second Americans decide to go to the bank and ask for their money back. The second that everybody tries to go and switch over to gold, everything crumbles. 2% of people. That's all it takes.
So how can it represent value if there's no value to it other than an agreed upon illusion? And this is a question that I posed to Chad, g p t, and it says, money represents value because people in society collectively agree to accept it as a medium of exchange for goods and services, right? Yeah. Sounds Sounds all right.
This agreement is based on trust in the shared belief that others will accept the currency. Okay, that's fair. It says that while it may seem like an illusion, this trust in societal consensus gives money its value and makes it a functional tool in the economy. Modern fiat currencies like the US dollar and the Euro, are not backed by physical commodities like golds silver.
Instead, their value comes from the faith people have in the stability of the issuing government and the central bank's ability to manage the money supply reasonably. . Now when you understand that that dollar in your hand only has value to the extent that you have faith in the government, and not even faith in the government, but faith in the central bank and not even faith in the central bank, faith in the very people that you and I have pulled back the curtain to over the last two years and realized they have absolutely none of our best interest in mind.
This goes on to say that in the functioning economy, trust in the currency is maintained through the central bank's management of inflation and interest rates, ensuring the money retains its purchasing power and remains a stable store of value. Additionally, legal tender laws and regulations further reinforce the acceptance of a currency as a value medium of exchange.
In summary, while the value of money may seem like an illusion, it's the trust and shared belief in its value that allow it to function as medium for exchange, ultimately enabling trade in the commerce within a society. Okay, now,  now that we realize that our entire currency is just an illusion based off of our faith in our governmental structure.
And not even that, but the central bank, here's the next question that you can ask yourself and in, in something that you will run into, right? They'll tell you that, oh, well it's backed by the F D I C, right? It's backed by the F D I C. That's a federal something Insurance Commission, right? And the F D I C ensures deposits up to $250,000 per depositor, per insured bank for each account ownership category.
Okay? That's what people will tell you. That could never happen. It's not gonna collapse. It's insured, right? And what it means by it's insured is all of the banks pay a premium on the monthly or however fricking they do it, I don't know, but they're, you know, quarterly, yearly, annual, uh, decade wise, who knows?
But they pay a premium to basically say that, oh, if our money runs. They'll pay back the customers, right? If, if all its fails in our fractional banking system, which now holds 0% reserves and people actually ask us for it, you guys got our back, right? And that's what people will tell you. That's what they want you to believe.
Is the F D I C has your back, right? The Federal Deposit Insurance Fund. Okay? Now each of those is $250,000 per deposit per account, which I found to be interesting. Okay? Maybe that, that gives me a little peace of mind, right? To know that there's a, a, a, a governmental insurance behind my money. That's a beautiful sound, isn't it?
Did you hear that? That is the sound of a founder's four giants, Imperial, i p a. All right? So it's backed.
It's backed by the , by the insurance company, right? It can't be fake, right? It can't be fictitious. It's not an illusion. They got our back. There's a contract that says they're gonna give us money, $250,000. Most people don't have that. I don't. You don't have that. I don't have that.  maybe, right? So it says, while it's difficult, so, so, so here's what I asked it, right?
So, so there's $250,000 insured per account. So there, there must be a nu a number out there for how much of these premiums has been gathered that can be distributed at any given time, right? That's how it works. So as of September 30th, 2021, the F D C'S D I F balance was approximately 122 billion. That's a lot of money, right?
That's a good amount of money. 122 billion. But when you realize that the total amount of estimated insured deposits was about 9.1 trillion, things start to crumble a little bit, which is again, some calculations I did with chat G P T. So there's 331 million American citizens, right? , there's 122 billion in its d I F balance for the F D I C and the total amount of estimated insured deposits was 9.1 trillion.
The the, the math doesn't seem to add up there, so I asked it what percentage of Americans would be insured by the F D I C before the money ran out? Seems like a fair question. There should be a hundred percent right.
The FT I c has several tools, it says, and strategies at this disposal to handle bank failures and protect insured depositors. In the event of a large scale banking crisis, it's unlikely that all insured deposits will be simultaneously at risk. The F D I C can also access additional resources. Okay, now it says that there's 331 million because it wouldn't answer that for me Originally, it said, you know, including the scale of the banking crisis, the size of individual deposits, and the extent of support from the US government.
However, the F D I C's primary goal is to maintain stability and public confidence.
So I asked it based on 331 million people and 122 billion, how much is allotted per citizen for the F D I C? It answered To calculate the average amount allotted per citizen based on the F D I C'S deposit insurance fund balance of 122.2 billion in the population of 331 million. You can defy the D I F balance by the population.
Take 122 billion, divide that by 331 million. You get the most disturbing statistic that you're going to hear today or figure that you're gonna hear today. $369 per American citizen. If everything crumbles, the insurance that they want you to believe has your back will pay out $369 and 18 cents.
Wow. That'll buy you a nice steak dinner, huh? Well, everything's crumbling. B beyond belief. While the government buildings are on fire, while the banks are collapsing, you're gonna get a payout of the F D I C if everybody goes to the bank to pull the deposits. Now, there's some caveats to that. Obviously, not every citizen's gonna run to the bank.
Not every citizen has $369. Some have far more than that too. Some of those are children, right? Take that into account. But $369 per citizen is insured. Not exactly the 250,000 that they want you to believe is it? Says that it's important to note that this calculation doesn't accurately represent how the F D I C insurance works.
The F D I C ensures deposits up to 250,000 per deposit per insured bank for each account ownership category, and not every citizen has the same amount of deposits. Also, the F D I C'S primary function is to ensure depositors and not to distribute the funds equally among the entire population. The calculation above is just a simple average.
It does not reflect the actual distribution of insured deposits or the specific coverage for individual deposits.
So now that I've readily terrified you, what do you do about it? Right? What can you do? Right? Is it, is it Bitcoin? Is it gold? Right? And, and we talk about things that are minted and, and have a scarcity to it, like a a, an actual built-in scarcity, not under the control of human beings who wanna profit off of your demise, right?
But what do you do about it? Well, I would say the first thing is definitely look into getting some, if you have a large amount of cash in the of fricking bank account, start to question whether or not you believe enough in the American financial system and the central banking system to continue to hold it there and, and bank on the idea that 2% of Americans aren't gonna go to the bank and ask for their money back at any given time.
Right. Or
is this 0% fractional banking intentional? Right. Why would, why would the Federal Reserve ever want to tank the American U S D? Right? Why would they ever wanna do that? They're in charge of it. Well, I think we need to go back and look at why they started the Federal Reserve to begin with. These men who owned one fourth of the world's wealth, between seven of them didn't do it for financial gains.
Right. That's, I mean, numbers feel nice to them. I'm sure it's just a little fun little game, but it's not about that. , right? It's about power, right? It's about power. You can go be lake, uh, uh, you can go be freaking courtside of the Lakers, you know, you can do all the fun things. Go in a high r own your own highrise building, right?
Who, why would they care at that point if they have that much money? Okay. Now, I really enjoyed this rant, um, by Mr. Griffin. And, uh, let's, let's let him take away the microphone here. Um, I'll interject a few times, but I, I do think there's so much value in this, the, the way that he ended his speech here, that I might let it, let it run for a little bit.
Um, so let's go ahead and see what he had to say about it
compared to $70,000 for labor and materials. . In other words, as Edison said, two and a half times more will be paid to the banks who did nothing than for those who provided all the labor and all of the materials. And you may say, well, yet that's true. But don't forget the time value of money. Reasonable interest is rational.
People need to be compensated for the sacrifice of their money over 30 years. That's a long period of time. Wait a minute, not this money. Ladies and gentlemen, nobody earned this money. Nobody saved this money. Nobody sacrificed anything for this money. This money was created out of nothing. And I suggest that $172,741 interest on nothing is excessive
He's talking about mortgages. 
I think we need to focus on this. We need a new definition of the word usy. Any interest on any loan of fiat Money, meaning money created out of nothing. Now this example of $172,741, unearned interest on a hundred thousand dollars home is like a grain of sand in the Sahara.
Look around the desert. All of the other homes of America, all the factories, all the machinery and the factories, all of the high-rise buildings, the, the hotels, all the airplanes, the automobiles, the farm equipment, the farm structures, everything that we have. You were looking at a similar relationship here.
This is staggering.  to consider the amount of money that is in this huge wide river of wealth flowing into the banking cartel because the money was created out of nothing. It's such a wide river of wealth. You can't even think across it in your mind. It's perpetually moving into the banking cartel. This is a dead short across the productive capacity of America.
This is money that should be going to the people who produce and who create. Instead of being siphoned off through a scam, think of what our standard of living could be if it weren't for this dead shore to cross our economy. Well, where is this money going, this river? Where is it flowing? You'll get the mental picture that maybe it's going into a, a lake somewhere.
Behind a dam. All this money is a rising, accumulating. People are getting richer and richer and richer. No, not so. It's not how it works. They're spending the money. What are they spending it for? Well, they're not spending it for more yachts and more ya uh, more mansions. That's not it. I mean, they got rid of the mansions back on Jekyll Island.
They got bored with those things. Once a person has all the money that they can possibly use for the material pleasures of life, what is left? Sure. Power, absolutely. They are spending this money for power, ladies and gentlemen, to acquire power over you and me and our children. They're literally buying up the world with it.
But I don't mean they're buying up the real estate or the hardware. They're buying up control over people.  technically in sociological terms, they're buying control over the power centers, which means those groups and institutions through which people live and work and follow leadership and accept information.
People are always associated in groups and they work in groups. They move in groups, and these groups have heads of them leaders. And this money has been going for many years to acquire influence, if not control over the leaders of these power centers in society. So they can therefore, indirectly influence and control you and me.
Specifically, that means they had been spending this river of wealth very freely. Dubai control over politicians, political parties, television networks, cable networks, newspapers, magazines, publishers, wire services, motion pictures, studios, universities, labor unions, church organizations, trade associations, labor unions, tax exempt foundations, multinational corporations, boy Scouts, girl Scouts, you name it.
Make your own list. I guarantee you, if you have a large influential organization which influences people, you will find that this river of wealth has been flowing partly into a, an attempt to acquire control over the leadership of these institutions and organizations. 
Ooh, man. Right. That is wild. That very river that he's discussing are these wealth management conglomerations, like BlackRock, like Vanguard, right?
That are buying up all the real estate that are buying up all the farms, all the agriculture, the school systems, the books that they put in, the school systems, the Netflix organizations, and the Disney pluses of the world, the news media's, cnn, Fox News, all of it. All of it is intertwined, and it comes back to the same river of wealth that is built off of the Federal Reserve system that is built off of the fictitious printing and not even printing the fictitious creation of monetary value.
That has no value. That has only has value because we believe in BlackRock and Vanguard because we believe in the central banking system, because we believe that our government has our best interest in mind, or at least we did. So when people talk about a financial collapse, it's not a, it's not a collapse of our financial system, is it's a collapse of belief.
Belief in our government, belief in our banking systems, belief in the very companies that you and I have pulled back the curtains on and realized have nothing but malice. Against the American people want nothing but control over. You want nothing but to influence your mind and, and, and insert venom into the veins of every child to make them think that they should get castrated and believe that they're a girl when they're a boy that want you to get an abortion instead of having a baby that want to institute the, the, the mass abortions of, of minority cultures, right?
All, all of these things, the boy scouts, the, the, the like, and, and again, I'm not, I'm not against religion. I, I'm against massive organized religious organizations, which is what he's talking about here. It's like 18 of the 20 top Facebook pages for Christian, uh, Facebook pages was ran by Russian troll farms.
Like, who owns those Russian troll farms? The ver You think If you think the, the reach and power and control of companies like BlackRock and Vanguard end in the United States and is only held by people within the United States, you're sadly mistaken that Venom has seeped into the culture, seeped into the entertainment, the news, media organizations, the school systems, the books that you and I read.
Everything, everything and everywhere. And that my friends, is why they wanted this to begin with. 1913 is what set this all off at Jekyll Island where the Federal Reserve was made. And you and I, the American culture, American society, the banking systems, currency, hard work. Consumerism capitalism turned into corporatism, which has really turned into like, I don't even know the word for it, but it's not even corporatism now.
Did I realize this? It's like just owned by seven fucking people, seven families that came together that created this.
And then you wanna talk about where those seven families came from and where their wealths come from. And that gets even weirder, right? The royal bloodline families, right? The Rockefellers, the Aldrick, JP Morgan Chase's dating back all the way to Egyptian times and Roman empires. You think all that wealth just went away?
No. It trickled down through family bloodlines for a very long time. That's a conversation for another day. But let's keep listening here. We got a few minutes left, 
especially those which. Are offered as opposition, especially those which supposedly are to stop this whole process from happening. Now, this has not only been going on in America, but this has been going on in every nation of the world, pretty much in the industrialized nations as it has gone on here.
But I'd like to call your attention to what's been happening in the so-called third world or the underdeveloped nations. This process is now complete. It's not going on. It's finished. They literally have bought those nations. Have you ever wondered what's going on there with the IMF World Bank? Every once in a while, on the back page of the newspaper, you read that Congress once again authorized another a hundred billion dollars or so to go to the World Bank, and then it explains very carefully that this money is being used for humanitarian reasons.
It's being used to uplift the standard of living of these poor.  that is an appearance of the fourth kind. If you ever saw one. It's not being used for that at all. If it is, they're not doing a very good job because after all these years, you cannot point to one of those countries, which has had its standard of living raised one iotta by this vast expenditure of money because it was never designed to do that.
The money does not go to the people. It does not go to the industries or the businesses of those countries where it might have a chance of raising the standard of living. It goes to the politicians, doesn't it? It goes to the governments of those countries and it is used specifically to, to perfect and strengthen the control mechanisms over their people.
Usually this starts out, it starts out as an inefficient dictatorship, but by the time they get the UN money, it ends up as an efficient dictatorship. They have a better organized and equipped. They have a better paid bureaucracy. More people in the bureaucracy, they have more ways of controlling their subjects.
They have food chains that they can offer to their friends and deny it to their enemies. This money is used to build totalitarian systems in every country that you want to point to and analyze. You see, these people, these leaders of these countries, for the most part, couldn't care less about the standard of living of their subjects as long as they live well.
They live in their mansions, have their yachts, their jet air aircraft, and they go to New York and live in the Waldorf Historia while they attend United Nations meetings. They're very happy with that. They have no ideology. Communism, socialism, fascism, capitalism. What difference does it make? Where's the money?
Mm-hmm. . That's it with these people. Four. We know how welfare families in this country can be second, third generation families and there's no hope at all of getting them off the dole because they can't imagine any other way of life. This happens at the international stage too. We're dealing with countries now that are second third in some cases, fourth generation welfare governments.
They don't know how to survive unless that money comes free through the International Monetary Fund in the World Bank means from us. There's no way in the world they're gonna break free from that. These countries, ladies and gentlemen, have already been purchased Lock, stock, and Barrel in this fashion, and they are now in place in the new World order and they're simply waiting for us to show up.
And that's the other side of the coin, because not only does this transfer of wealth to these countries from us not raise their standard of living, but it does in fact help to lower ours. And this too is part of the plan. A strong nation is not a candidate for surrendering its sovereignty. But if a nation can be brought to its needs, if it is hungry, desperate, if it has chaos on its street, in its streets, if it has political turmoil, then the people in that nation will much more likely accept any solution that's offered to them by their government or by a world government if there's anarchy in the streets.
As we saw in Watts in Los Angeles, people were joyous. When the soldiers showed up, they were joyous because this now was an end to anarchy. It was a dress rehearsal. They won't care whether the helmets on these people are blue or brown. If it says UN on the side, they won't. That won't make any difference.
They'll say, thank God for the un. Finally brought restored peace to our streets. . And if people are hungry and they're out of work and they, they don't know what to do in the economy, they'll be so thankful for a un monetary unit, which has purchasing power a little bit. Thank God for this un money because the old American dollars are put, don't know what to do with this is the plan, ladies and gentlemen, to weaken America.
And so that's the process. And I'm mentioning this because I want to emphasize to you that what is going on here is has nothing at all to do with wealth. The name of the game now is power.
And that my friends, is your lesson on the American financial system. It is all about power. And the next step here to me and from where I'm sitting and what I'm seeing across the entire country and the entire world, Is the implementation
of a financial system that is based off of a social credit score, cuz that is the ultimate power, is a digital currency that has no paper, fiat currency at all. Cause when you implement that, they can make more money. They can make money off of every transaction, right? They can track everything that you do and they can stop you from dissenting, from speaking out against these things because then you can't buy the right foods for your family.
You can't buy clothes for yourself. You can't buy diapers for your children. You can't get an education, can't put gas in your car. It all comes down to power. So as I've said before, do what you need to do, but protect yourself and protect your family. All right guys. Thank you so much for listening. I hope you learned something today.
Leave a five star review, subscribe. Head over to the ck austin adams.ck.com. I love you. Have a great day.

Disneys Darkest Secret: Lifelong Grooming, Beastiality & January 6th

Welcome to the Adams Archive. Hosted by Austin Adams, we explore the wild, bizarre, and often unsettling events happening across the country and around the world.
In today's episode, we expose the shocking belief that the FBI conducted a false flag on its own people on January 6th. With evidence that even the left is starting to acknowledge, we uncover the implications of this belief on society as a whole. We also explore historical parallels and eerie similarities to other events, including the Governor Whitmer situation and events dating back to the 60s.
But that's just the tip of the iceberg. We also discuss a disturbing new patent filed by Ford, which would allow them to take control of your car and even drive it to an impound lot if you fall behind on your payments. And if you thought things couldn't get any crazier, we delve into Spain's recent legalization of bestiality and the legislation behind it.
But the most shocking revelation of all is about Disney. Something darker than anything we've discussed before. We'll reveal the details of this disturbing discovery and its implications for our culture and society.
Don't miss this episode. Hit that subscribe button now to join us as we navigate these compelling and thought-provoking topics. If you enjoy the show, please leave a five-star review and help us climb the ranks. Let's jump into it.
Join our Substack and follow us:
https://linktr.ee/theaustinjadams
 
Transcription:
 
  
 
hello, you beautiful people and welcome to the Adams Archive. My name is Austin Adams, and thank you so much for listening today. We are going to be touching on some wild  wildness going on across the country right now, including 61% of all voters, not just Republican, but all voters believe that the FBI conducted a false flag against its own people on January 6th by using Agent Provocateurs.
Crazy. I, I, I did not expect the left to agree with that, but apparently they're starting to come around and, and so we'll go through some evidence of that. We'll talk about the implications of society as a whole, agreeing with that point as, as a, as a majority at this point, and then we'll go into some historical.
Historical, uh, coincidences, I guess not coincidence, but parallels, , of other events which kind of look eerily similar to that, including the governor Whitmer situation, if you haven't heard about that one. And then some all the way dating back to the sixties. , we're also going to talk about a new patent, which was filed this week by Ford, which would allow them to basically take over your car, shut down your air conditioning, eliminate your ability to roll down your windows, and actually drive itself to an impound lot if you find yourself behind on your payment.
So we'll talk about that, which is pretty crazy in and of itself. We are also going to dive into the recent situation, uh, regarding Spain. Basically legalizing beast.
I didn't expect that to be out in today's episode, did you? ? So we will talk about that. The actual law in legislation that was passed as a result, to make that happen. And then last but not least, our final topic of today, and the one that we'll touch on the longest is going to be a revelation that actually was passed to me by my wife regarding Disney now.
 It's pretty dark. It, it's probably darker than the other situations that we've heard of combined. It's, it's pretty crazy and I don't think it's anything that anybody has touched on at this point. And, uh, we'll talk about all of it. All right now, in the meantime, Go ahead and hit that subscribe button.
It would make me feel all fuzzy inside. It would make me feel so good. Hit that subscribe button. You know, I'm gonna hit it in about halfway through this episode and ask you to do the same. So you might as well get away from that feeling that you have in the pit of your stomach. When you know that, I'm going to ask you again, get it outta the way.
Hit that subscribe button. If you're new here. If you are not new here, and even if you are, leave a five star review. All right? I would appreciate it. From the bottom of my heart, those five star reviews completely help get us up in the rankings, and Lord knows we need it to have these types of conversations surrounding these terrible tragedies that are going on in our country and around the world.
All right, so leave a five star review. If you would write something nice. I don't know. Whatever it is. Whether it's about my, you know, I don't know, my silly hair or my crazy, I don't know. Whatever it is, write it down. Talk about your favorite topic. I don't know. But write something and leave a five star view.
All right. Thank you so much. , and let's jump into it.
 
All right. All right, let's get into it. But first, head over to the CK Adams, not adams, austin adams.ck.com, and you can get our podcast companion free of cost for now. Um, sign up now. I would appreciate it. You'll get all the clips, articles, links, videos, all of it directly to your email every single week.
And, you'll be able to get all the articles that I wrote up surrounding these topics for you. So Austin Adams dot.com, that's all I got. The very first article that we're gonna be talking on today is going to be that 61% of all American voters believe that the FBI conducted a false flag against its own people on January 6th by using Agent Provocateurs.
You heard that right? 61% of American voters. Now, that's not 61% of Republican voters. That's 61% of all voters, liberal conservative. Middle of the road, libertarian, uh, what were those, uh, people who, I don't know, green party, whatever the hell you, you believe in whichever of these religious sex you find yourselves in 61%.
A majority, a vast majority. It's not 51%. It's an astonishing 10% more than being split down the middle. Believe that the FBI in the American government set up the American people to cause this coup like situation at the Capitol right now. There's some things that we saw originally that led us to believe this.
I think if you've been following me for a while, you know, I've done whole sections of this show in, in portions of this on Ray. And maybe I'll talk about him a little bit later, but Ray Eps is at the epicenter of all of this. And then you go all the way back to Ted Cruz questioning the fbi. And I believe it was like the head of the department or one of one of those higher up people.
This woman who sat there without answering a single question about this would not give a straight answer at all. But now we have the majority of the country believing that our own government is willing to set us up to cause a violent reaction, just to get, I don't know, some, some pushback or belief surrounding Joe Biden or against President Trump.
And this should tell you everything that you need to know about the Trump presidency. You saw all of the mainstream media just going after him, going after him, and now we know, or at least 61% of the American populists believe that our own government, our own government, put people in harm's way and had Ashley Babbitt killed in the Capitol building as a result.
of their own Provo Pro Provocation. Is that a word? Provocation? Provocate Provo. Provocation . And you go back to all the clips. They still will not release the video footage. Still will not release the video footage. How many, how many years? January, 2021. January 6th. We are now two years past this event, and they have 80,000 hours of footage and they won't release it.
I wonder why. Maybe because it shows police officers letting people in with waving arms, removing barricades, unlocking doors. Maybe because it shows the tragic death of Ashley Babbitt in a way that isn't helpful to the FBI's agenda or Biden's agenda. Maybe.
So here's the evidence, or, well, maybe not the evidence, but here's the article. Explosive new polling data has just been released and it has the potential to shake the very foundations of the American democracy. According to the latest Rasmus employee, stunning, 61% of likely voters, including 50 per 57% of Democrats believe that federal agents play a role in inciting the Capitol riot of January 6th and 2021.
This means that a majority of Americans believe that their own government may have had a hand in one of the most traumatic events in recent American history, and maybe not traumatic, but dramatic might be the more P likely of terms. The poll respondents, how likely it is it that undercover government agents helped provoke the Capitol riot, and the results are shocking.
Of those surveyed, 39% said very likely, 22% said somewhat likely. That means a grand total of 61% of likely voters believe that federal agents played a role. The poll also revealed that 59% of men and 63% of women believed that federal agents had helped provoke the capital riot. This majority of voters who believed the capital riot was not simply a natural occurrence breaks down among political party affiliations as well.
57% of Democrats said it is either very likely 34%, well, 34% total. 57% of Democrats said it is either very likely or somewhat likely, very likely being 34%, somewhat likely being 23%. While Republicans, the numbers are 51% said very likely, 19% said somewhat likely. Wow, that's pretty crazy. Many across the media have already questioned the idea that Trump supporters watching then President Donald Trump had taken it upon themselves with no provocation.
Hey, provocation, this award to walk from the ellipse of the capitol and demand entry. Tucker Carlson is one of the many who stated his belief based on photos and eyewitness accounts that federal agents have been encouraging Trump supporters to enter the Capitol building. Going back to Ray Abs, it's, we're going into the Capitol.
You remember that video into the Capitol. Tomorrow we're going into the capitol. Him sitting there inciting these people while everybody around him points their finger and mocks him going, fed, fed, fed, fed, fed, pointing at him, calling out in the moment. We didn't need two years to decide this. The people that were there and saw this man saying we're gonna go into the capitol, knew immediately, knew immediately that he was a federal agent, trying to provoke them into some sort of riot.
They were priming the public, priming the people that were around there the day before this happened to cause this to happen. And again, we have an American veteran, Ashley Babin, who died as a result of this provocation. Goes on to say that this idea that the government may have initiated the false flag against itself is dangerous to the overall belief in American democracy.
History has shown that when the public loses face in their government institutions, it can lead to destabilize, destabilization, and unrest. The Rassmuson Poll also asked likely voters whether they thought that the hours of surveillance footage captured on the day should be released to the public. An overwhelming majority of American likely voters, 80% total believe it's important that the footage be released while majority of both parties weighing in that the public has the right to see the footage.
Now, what does that other 20% even mean at this point, if you're a 20% saying that we shouldn't release the videos, you're literally just showing your cards that you are somebody who is on the side of Big Daddy government and big brother wanting to like just completely. Like what is it? Ossify yourself like completely.
Uh, like put yourself in this cocoon of like against the general world saying that I don't care what the facts are, I don't care what the reality is. My reality is Trump bad man, everybody else, good man. And everything that he does is bad and everything. And it doesn't matter whether he did it or not. It doesn't matter whether our government set him up or not.
I don't care. Right? That's what that 20% shows me. The latest polling data adds to a long list of historic examples where the government has used agent provocateurs to incite events from the 10 of 12 F B I agents. We recall this with Governor Whitmer who were involved in the kidnapping of Governor Whitmer to the infamous.
COINTEL Pro program run by the FBI in the 1960s and seventies, which we'll get into in a second. There are plenty of instances where the government has used underhanded tactics to achieve its goals. The American people have a right to know what really happened on January 6th, whether the government was involved in any way.
Now, that brings up a big issue, right when, when majority of the country, majority of the country believes that our own government inside today riot into our most, like one of the most protected government institutions in the world, one of the most symbolic buildings we have as an American institution.
Our own government could have potentially staged this. At least 61% of people believe that. Now, again, what does that mean for our nation
when you no longer believe in election? When you no longer believe that our own government has our best interest in mind, when you believe that they will actively incite political unrest in riots, open doors for you to make it happen, and uncaring murder an American veteran, for the sake of your own agenda, the American people are going to start to not believe in this government institution anymore.
And what happens? What do we know that happens when, when places like Afghanistan, places like Iraq, places like Mexico, when we have these, these ideas that the, the system no longer works, right? It's rotten from the core, rotten for the structural foundation of our nation is rotten down to its structure, down to down to the, the studs that are holding up the walls riddled with corruption.
If you can no longer have a vote or a say in who goes into office, and now all of a sudden we find yourselves with an, I don't know, what is he, 85 years old, blubbering, dementia ridden man who's embarrassing our country at every single turn. When you no longer believe in the fabric of democracy, when you no longer believe that your vote has a a meaning, and no matter what you do, how many people you talk to, how many people actually vote that it will never go the way that you want it to.
It'll go the way that the elites want it to. We will find ourselves in historically very violent, unsettled public discourse, which is absolutely not where I wanna see this nation go. But historically, that's what happens, right? When you can no longer vote to use your voice, that's where it. Right, and that's where this will go.
Unfortunately, as we thi see things progress, right? If these things continue this way, and the American people can no longer have any, any belief in the people who are running this country, the people behind the curtain, or at least they, we, they pull back the curtain like they have already. And we see that companies and organizations like BlackRock, like Vanguard are actually running the show.
People like the World Economic Forum in Clause Schwab, when we know now for sure that the only people that matter, the only people that have a vote are the ones who have a corporation or a wealth management fund large enough to put candidates in place like George Soros, like Klaus Schwab. Those are the people who have a real vote.
Now you have the, the organizations that are being ran by those types of people that are being funded by those types of people that are being put in positions of power or, or at least running and managing those people like the puppeteers of the world. Who are operating these FBIs, these three letter organizations, when we know that that's what's going on.
We have things that happen like assassinations of presidents, which we are fairly positive at this point. Otherwise, why wouldn't you release the records that they conducted those types of operations? Why should we believe in their government right now? Let's go into the COINTELPRO program or counterintelligence program, which was a secret and illegal program ran by the Federal Bureau of Investigation from the fifties to the seventies.
Its primary aim was to disrupt and dismantle political organizations that the government considered a threat to national security, particularly those associated with civil rights, anti-war in radical leftist movements. The PRO program was launched in 1956 under F FBI director J Igar Hoover, and operated in secrecy for many years.
The F B I used a variety of tactics to target groups and individuals, including wiretapping mail fraud. Harassment. The Bureau also used infiltrators and agent provocateurs to create divisions within groups and incite violent confrontations. The Conor Intelligent Program's primary targets were civil rights and anti-war activists, as well as groups that advocated for racial equality in the rights of marginalized communities.
The program worked to disrupt and discredit these groups by spreading false information, infiltrating their organizations, and using informants to sow distrust and create divisions. So now we want to think that that was so long ago, right? Oh, it's the sixties and the seventies, right? Oh, they would never do that now, would they?
How wild. How wild is it that that's where we found ourselves today is that we, we just think the government has all the sudden changed. Right? And, and we see this with people like, you know, is, is it any coincidence that people like John Lennon, people like Bob Marley, people like Jimmy Hendrix, people like the list goes on and on and on of people who randomly died at a young age.
And generally it was people who were speaking out against the government, right? John Lennon, anti-war, Bob Marley, anti-war. Right. Speaking out against the, the, um, you know, accreditation or of, or, or for racial equality. Right. People like, uh, people like Martin Luther King. Hmm. Right. All along the same time.
You think all those people just suddenly. From natural causes. Right. You think our government didn't have a hand in assassinating some of the single largest and, and biggest opponents and, and dissidents of the public narrative during a time of war that was for the military industrial complex. Do you think that there's not enough money involved in the military industrial complex that they wouldn't do something like that?
One of the most infamous pro examples of this was its targeting of the Black Panther Party. The FBI's efforts to disrupt the Panthers included the use of informants, wiretaps, and smear campaigns. The bureau also used undercover agents to incite violent confrontations between the panthers and other groups, including police.
The FBI's actions were illegal and violated the civil rights of countless individuals and groups. The program was eventually exposed in the 1970s, and many of its tactics were officially deemed unconstitutional. However, the damage has already been done and many civil rights and anti-war activists were subjected to harassment.
And persecution by the government, not to mention potentially assassinations. It was a dark chapter in the American history that serves as a reminder of the dangers of unchecked government power. The program's tactics were illegal and violated. The civil rights of countless individuals and its legacy still resonates today and the ongoing struggle for social justice and political freedom.
This should spark complete outrage from the entire country. All right, so that's to me, the fact that 61% of people all agree. That's one of the only things that we're gonna get a majority agreement on from the country right now. 61% of poli people believe the FBI set up January 6th. All right, now let's move on.
Okay, so the next topic that we're gonna touch on is going to be that for. Motor company has now put a patent in to be able to surveil you. Shut down your vehicle, turn off your air conditioning, everything in between. If you get behind on the on the car payment, big Brother is watching you and now he can take your car too.
Ford Motor Company has applied for a patent on a new technology. It says that would allow them to remotely repossess your car if you failed to make a payment. Just, just a payment. The proposed system would give owners a warning about a mis payment before disabling certain features such as gps, air conditioning and the radio.
But if you continue to neglect your payments, the car can then lock you out of it and drive itself autonomously to an impound. What  that is the craziest, do you remember the movie? It was a Disney movie called, uh, what was it, like Smart Home or, uh, gosh, what was it? Pretty sure it was something like Smart Home.
It was like this exact scenario. It didn't have to do with payments, but it was like basically the, this ai uh, you know, hologram of a woman was the, uh, was the manifestation of the house's technology and the, the house saw these people doing things that it didn't like. So it locked, it went into lockdown mode and they couldn't even leave their own house.
Right. It it. So we'll go into that analogy a little bit further in a minute cause I think that's an interesting one. Um, but Ford's patent application states that the lockdown feature could be lifted momentarily in case of an emergency to allow the vehicle to travel to a medical facility. But it also proposes a possible caveat where delinquent owners working toward clearing their balance would have their car locked only on weekends to allow them to go to work and earning income to make payments toward their vehicles.
Could you imagine your daddy, corporate daddy is now going to take your keys on the weekend and not allow you to drive your car, which you purchased it, and own , at least I'll own the loan on. Um, if you miss a payment, this life is getting crazy,
this type of surveillance. Base lending, it says, is an infringement on personal privacy and raises serious concerns about the growing trends toward connected vehicles in electric cars. As cars become increasingly digital and reliant on technology, there is a greater risk that our personal information and rights will be compromised.
According to Ford, the system is designed to solve the issue of uncooperative owners who attempt to impede the repossession operation and can lead to confrontations. But this type of technology could also be used to target vulnerable individuals who may be struggling to make payments in face losing their cars, which is often a critical lifeline for Americans.
The patent application filed in August of 2021 was formally published last week for public review. A company spokesperson said the patent submitted as a normal course of business. They said, but they aren't necessarily an indication of new business or product plans. Yeah, okay. We believe you Ford.
Regardless of Ford's intentions, this type of technology is a clear example of how movement towards connected vehicles and electric cars is going to inherently mean more technology that only infringes further on personal rights. We must remain vigilant and advocate for stronger privacy protections to ensure that our personal information and freedom are not compromised by these new technologies.
Okay, so think of it like this. Compare it to your house like we talked earlier, right? Imagine coming home after a long day and find that your fridge, TV, and air conditioning have all been disabled. , because you're behind on a house payment, right? Imagine sweating being in 90 degree heat in Arizona, 110 degrees outside, and they're just.
Making you lose weight every minute because you can't make your payment. Like is it not enough that you're behind the payment anymore? Is it not enough that you have the shame of, of creditors calling you or getting the potential of your car, getting repossessed or feeling like you, that it is so wild to me that they want to shame you to the point where they will lock your windows, turn, not allow you to listen to the radio and disable your car on weekends because you can't make a payment.
Shame on you.
So if we apply the same logic to homes, we can see that a future where our appliances, electronics, and even doors could be locked, right? Your ba, let's say you have a patio, they no longer want your patio door to work. So you gotta walk out the front door and walk all the way around to your back patio.
right? You can no longer use the second bathroom. You all gotta use the first bathroom. Oh, and by the way, we're gonna lock the other three rooms in your house and just allow you access to one room. You can all sleep on the floor there. We're not letting you in. Right? All the amenities that come with that home that you purchased right now, think of who this is targeting, right?
This is targeting low income. This is targeting ar areas of people who are, you know, going to get into these types of loans unknowingly or without the ability to make these payments. This is gonna target a, a majority of, of minority communities, which are historically in these communities where they're having more difficulties financially, right?
Statistically and factually. That's true. And so this is going to be targeting them specifically to do things like this, right? It's not just being limited to cars in the future, right? You can limit this to everything. You can limit this to your cell phone, right? Imagine having everything on your phone, disabled, all of the apps, all of your social media, all all of the stuff besides phone calls to Verizon, to, to your, you know, mom and your dad into 9 1 1 because you're behind on, on a payment.
I guess Verizon kind of already does that, right? If you miss a payment for long enough, they only allow you to make a phone call, but you can still connect to wifi, right? So you still have access to all those things, right? They're just not gonna pay for you to go do. It's like if they, I don't know, some analogy with gas  or like charging, I don't know.
Um, but yeah, just, just think of all the applications. Right there. There's so many ways that this smart technologies, this surveillance big brother technology can be utilized in the future and, and that is a future that I don't want to be a part of. I want to get in a car and press down the gas, and I want gas to be siphoned and I want it to do whatever freaking magic that happens in an engine.
There's probably some mechanics listening to this that just want to shake me for not knowing exactly how that works. I want a combustion engine bitch, and I want to be able to put gas in it from the earth that was mined in Saudi Arabia or from some foreign land, or from Canada or Alaska. I want to put liquid into it, and I want to drive by a government building with my middle finger up.
That's what I wanna do because there's nothing you can do to stop me from moving. To stop me from driving my vehicle from, from freedom of transportation. And that's what you're gonna find. And we did our last episode on smart cities, right? 15 minute cities is what they're called. And this is another piece of that, right?
They don't want you to have vehicles. They want you to own nothing and be happy about it, right? They don't want you to have the freedom of transportation. They don't even want you to be able to drive 15 minutes away. Well, 16, right? They don't want you to have that freedom. They don't want you to have any freedom.
Not unless daddy government or daddy corporation, which is truly what daddy government is, has a say so in it, right? And, and, and what we're finding now is like all the people that you know, I am, I am absolutely for capitalism. What we are now is not capitalism. What we are now is corporatism, right? Our government, our institutions, our colleges, our voting processes, our candidates, our.
education systems are media, corporations. Our news, the, the shows that your children watch are all owned by corporations who have corporate interests, right? And I've talked about this before. When it comes to corporations, a corporation is a living, breathing entity, right? At least once it gets shareholders, when it's a business, once it, once, it's a, a small business and it goes to a PORs, a, a, a position where it's publicly traded, where there's board members and the CEO who only acts out the po the the needs of the board members.
And when they don't, they get removed and kicked out and the new CEO comes in. When you get to a point where a business goes away from having a leader who is truly at the helm, where it is ran by board members, it loses its humanity.
It no longer has a moral compass. The only compass it has is off of profitability. , right? So when you have a corporation that has to determine whether or not it should, I don't know, release some type of hmm. Virus so that it can make billions in profits, that doesn't seem like a bad business model to the board members who are just trying to make a profit whose CEO has to enact those decisions or fear being removed from their multimillion dollar position, right?
That the entity only thrives off of profitability. It doesn't thrive off of helping humanity. It doesn't thrive off of giving, giving to the needy. It doesn't thrive off of educating the public. It doesn't thrive off of any of these things. It, it thrives off of profitability, right? And profitability is off of the, generally, off of the detriment in, in many cases when it comes from a corporation.
To society, right? When we look at things like the, the tactics that were used by cigarette companies back in the eighties and seventies and even early nineties, right? Like when we look at the ways that they lobbied physicians to use their name and say that this is the doctor recommended cigarette, try Merl Burrow Red.
Recommended by two out three doctors. Little did you know, they surveyed three doctors, two of which they paid $5 million for that advertisement, right? When you have all these black hat little marketing tactics that drive profitability ran by the ceo, who trickles down to the to, to everybody in between, that's all based off profitability that that loses its moral compass, right?
There's no longer somebody there to go, I don't like where this is going, and if they feel that way, they can't say it because the second they say it, in an organization where it's ran by board members and not a leader with a moral compass, it loses all of that humanity to it. It has to continue to thrive off of more profitability.
Now, the other thing is growth, right? A company has to continually grow no matter what. When you have a company like Pfizer who made billions of dollars off of their vaccine, . You think next year they're gonna have a 30% drop in revenue and their board members and shareholders are gonna be okay with that?
No. The bar has been set and now it has to be exceeded every single year. Or it's a loss or else their share, their stock price goes down and they can't have that. So what do they do? Again? Record year record numbers, record profits for everybody involved in the company, you know, except the employees, the people who did the work, and also humanity, who so happens to die when we profit so much money.
But you know, let's forget that, you know, not to mention the Project Veritas video, where they actually said that they were actively working on messing with Coronaviruses intentionally to potentially put out vaccines preemptively. Hmm.
It doesn't stop at Ford Motor Company folks. Does not stop there. All right. Now the next thing that we're gonna talk about is going to be that  Spain. I can't even get this one out. I, this is so bizarre to me. I, it's, it's so bizarre to me that this is a conversation that I'm having to have
in the bizarre move. The Spanish Parliament has approved a new animal welfare law that essentially legalizes bestiality in Spain. They pass legislation that legalizes bestiality, but there's a caveat as long as the animal doesn't get hurt too badly. Yeah, yeah, I heard that. Right. It's now perfectly legal to have sex with an animal in Spain.
As long as you don't. To bring them to the vet afterwards. , according to a new law, if you're caught in the act of sexually exploiting an animal, they don't req that and they don't require veterinary treatment. You won't face any criminal charges, right? Who needs consent when you got a nice legal loophole to screw your dog?
Now, it's not just the fact that bestiality is now technically legal, that's so shocking. In this case, it's the fact that the law was supported by Spain's Minister of Social Rights and 23 Agenda. That's their title, supporter, Spain's Minister of Social Rights, and 2030 Agenda. That's the title of this person.
So if that tells you anything about where this is going, and this person's name is Ian Valara Ortega. I don't know if I pronounce that right, but it's probably better than you would've done . Let's be honest. I. Let's, like seriously, what kind of world are we living in? Were our government actively, not our government, but the Spain government, maybe they're a little freakier over there, but actively advocates for animal abuse.
Now, of course, like almost every other country, bestiality was previously illegal in Spain with hefty penalties for anybody caught in engaging in this disgusting act. But the new welfare law reforms the penal code and deletes the sexual exploitation of animals language from the code. So imagine that they had a vote on this.
They sat down as a group and decided that they wanted to be able to have sex with animals . So they actively removed exploitation. It deleted the sexual exploitation language from the code. Right. In the year 2023, we are actively having to fight for the basic rights of animals, not to be raped by its owners, not even its owners.
You could probably, I mean, I wonder if we're gonna see a very large uptake in uptick in Spain, farmers, . Like all of a sudden people are just having a tremendous amount of livestock and donkeys, . Now, um, this a, you know, it, it's so crazy. A animal cannot consent to a sexual act. I don't know why I have to say that.
Right? But an animal cannot consent, right? They don't speak English right now. How, how, how soon until we start seeing brothels full of horses and dogs and whatever else is good dolphins aren't dolphins like supposed to be? I'm pretty sure there's like, Some accounts were dolphins were like raping people in, in the ocean where they would like, that's a highly reported thing where like women are in the ocean and, uh, dolphins, like, I'm pretty sure there was a woman who actually like, had a dolphin boyfriend that was like a trainer or something that got fired for having sex with this dolphin so often
So maybe there's something to this. Maybe we're gonna find that Spain just is such a happier country. Maybe we'll find that, I don't know hu human rape statistics go down, but that I highly doubt it. Right? We're gonna see a whole market that's surrounding which, which horses? The prettiest. They're gonna start putting lipstick on horses at, at auctions.
Right. How, how, how, how weird that we're even having this discussion right now. And here's the better answer to this, is there's absolutely nobody who's going to have something happen to the animal that they did this to, and then actively go seek out a vet to correct the issue. Like, Hey, sorry, I was.
Having sex with my cat now it has this weird kink in its neck and it only meow is backwards. Uh, , I don't know. Right? And you're gonna have some weirdo sicko specifically just having a farm in the back of his house so he can have his way with all of these animals in Spain. Now you don't think that that's gonna be a thing, but this somebody somewhere in Spain is gonna, he's gonna be that guy
Okay? Now I don't know what else to talk about on that, other than the fact that I am utterly shocked. Utterly, get it.
didn't even have that one written down, folks. All right. Now the last and final topic for the day is going to be.  probably one of the darker things that we've talked about here, right? This is dark Disney is grooming our children, and the is far worse than you could have ever imagined. We're not talking about Baymax and tampons.
We're not talking about like Luna Moon, the superhero and pronouns. We're not talking about the pride family pushing critical race theory. All right. Are you, are you ready to have your childhood ruined? Because this doesn't just encompass the new and up and coming shows. This isn't the new liberal woke Disney.
This is a theme that has woven through the fabric of almost every TV show and movie that has come out of Disney since we were kids and even before that. All right, are you ready? Now my wife came to me with this realization on one of our children's shows that they were watching, which they will never watch again.
All right. My wife came to me and she said something weird that I didn't realize before is it seems like Disney has an overwhelming amount of TV shows where the child keeps a secret from their parent and confides in their uncle.
All right? So I took that information and ran with it. After running a comprehensive analysis of all Disney shows, popular AI Chatbot chat, G P t concluded, concluded that 40. Of TV shows on Disney feature, a storyline where the child keeps a secret from their parents and tells it to their uncle. Let me be clear.
This is not just some lame plot theme. This is a sinister grooming tactic that every single parent and human should be outraged about. This is absolutely disgusting. Okay, I have 28 examples of this in front of me, and I will read them all off for you. Okay. I'll read them quickly and then I'll go into the details.
Lizzie McGuire, Kim. Possible Austin and Allie. Shake it up. Good luck, Charlie. The sweet life of Zach and Cody. Wizards of Waverly Place, gravity Falls, Finns and Ferb Big City Gardens, the proud family, the Emperor's New School. Lilo and Stitch. The series Tangled. The series, Casey Undercover, stuck in the middle.
Sydnee to the Max Bunked, the Sweet Life of Zach and Cody. Girl Meets World. Raven's Home Live in Madie. Jesse, good luck, Charlie, Austin and Allian. Those are just some of the shows that were pointed out by chat, G B T, just some of them. There was almost a hundred TV shows that I got to point this common theme out for, and it equaled, according to this AI technology, 30 to 40% of the TV shows had a theme to it, including this.
Now, I'll walk you through this. I'll just give you some really, really brief overviews of these TV shows. Um, It's quite alarming. All right, here's Lizzie McGuire. Lizzie McGuire confides in her uncle David Gordon about her struggles in school and her crush on the classmate Ethan. Instead of her parents, Kim possible keeps her secret life as a teenage spy, a secret from her parents and confides in her uncle, who is also a former spy Austin thee.
Allie Dawson confides in her uncle Barry about her stage fright and her dreams of becoming a songwriter. Rocky Blue from Shake It Up Confides in her uncle Louis about her dance career. Good luck Charlie. Um, Teddy Duncan confides in her uncle Mel about her desire to become a writer and a secret video diary project, the Sweet Life of Zach and Cody.
Cody Martin confides in his uncle Aristotle about his fear of performing despite being an aspiring magician, wizards of Waverly place. Alex often confides in her uncle, who is a wizard and often own. Erin owns a magic shop. Finns and Ferb keep their invention secret from their parents, but occasionally confide in their Uncle Lawrence.
Big city Greens. Cricket green often keeps secrets from his parents and confides in his laid back and adventurous. Uncle Bill, the Proud Family, proud Penny Proud keeps secrets from her parents and confides in her uncle, her uncle Bobby, the Emperor's New School. Cusco keeps his status as an emperor secret from his parents and confides in his cool and adventurous Uncle Pacha.
Lilo and Stitch keep their experiment secret from her older sister and confide in their alien Uncle Jamba
Rapunzel from Tangled. The series often keeps her secrets from her parents and confides in their adventurers and supportive father-in-law. The captain of the Guards, Casey Undercover Teenage Spy, who keeps her secrets from other parent or from her parents, and confides in her uncle, who of also happens to be her handle.
Uh, stuck in the middle, Sidney to the max. All of these are the same story.
All of them. They keep something from their parents and they tell their uncle, right? Jesse, Emma Ross keeps a secret from her parents and confides in her uncle Caleb. Good luck. Charlie Teddy Duncan keeps a secret from her parents and confides in her uncle Mel Austin and Allie. Allie Dawson keeps a secret from her parents and confides in her uncle Barry.
All of these shows are grooming your child to hold a secret from you and to confide in a male figure in your family. Now, I wish this was a world where this wasn't a problem. I wish this was a world we're statistically speaking that those individuals, that they're grooming your child to confide in, to hold secrets actively from you isn't the individual who's most likely to assault your child sexually.
I wish that was not the case. I wish Disney could have shows about confiding in your uncle and holding secrets from your parents. Make it not a bad thing, but I also want to highlight the fact that there is virtually zero shows where the same exact scenario is happening with ant. You cannot 0.1 out, cannot find one.
What kind of message does this send young girls? What kind of message does this tell young boys? Right? Does it, it tells them that it's okay to have a secret with your uncle and to keep it from your parents. It tells them that being groomed is a normal part of growing up.
Now, this isn't to take away from the agenda of pushing transgenderism onto your children. This isn't to take away from the agenda of sexualizing, hyper sexualizing your children. This isn't going to take away from the agenda where there was a show recently that I haven't heard anybody talk about this one from Disney.
Haven't heard this yet. There's a show called like Luna Moon or something like that, some moon TV show where this girl is sitting in front of a chess, uh, chess robot on the floor, like doing this cool scene where she's playing chess with this robot. And the robot goes, my name is something robot, and my pronouns are she, her pronouns like, no bitch, you're a robot.
You don't get pronouns, but they're grooming your child to believe that these things are okay. You go back to the, the, the head of Disney in their internal meetings who came out on a Zoom call and said, I am pushing this LGBTQ qia a plus element o p agenda on an every single PO way that I can, right? You see it in Turning Red.
You see it in the Baymax series. You see it in like this Luna show. You see it all across the new Disney movies, almost every single one of 'em, stranger Worlds. You see it in all of them and she's gloating about it, gloating about it.
Now these are not mistakes, right? This is not a fun little plot twist, right? This is a concerted effort to groom our children concerted effort. This is intentional programming that leads to extremely dangerous positions for your child to find themselves in, to believe that it's normalized, to believe that it's okay to keep a secret from you because they didn't think of that before, until they get programmed by Disney.
To think that it's cool to keep a secret from your parents,
and it gets even darker when we get into the statistics of this one in nine young girls, one in nine girls experience sexual abuse at the hands of an adult. One in 53 boys experienced sexual abuse at the hands of an adult, more than 10. Of the young girls who watch these Disney shows will have been sexually assaulted in their lifetime, more than 10%.
One out of every 10 girls who watches this Disney show where they make it seem okay to keep a secret from your parents and confide in your cool uncle will have been groomed to believe that that's acceptable, groomed to believe that it's acceptable to hide something from your parents and confide in your uncle more than 10%.
In more than 40% of the show. 30 to 40% of the shows has a similar theme.
The N S V R C reports that 93% of child sexual abuse victims know their abuser. 93% of abuse, abuse children know their abuser. Almost a hundred percent, 34% of the perpetrators being family members and 60% being acquaintances or other trusted individuals. 34% out of the one out of nine girls are assaulted by their family member, and Disney thinks it's cute to groom them to keep secrets from their parents and confide in their uncle.
Now, here's my question to you. Do we really want to give these predators a helping hand by normalizing secrets, keeping secrets from your parents, confiding in your uncle, right? This is a global issue. This is not just in the United States, right? And, and, and there's been calls for boycotts and I even, I am guilty.
Of keeping Disney Plus for my children, even through Turning Red, even through Baymax, all the shit that I talked about, that even I am guilty of maintaining my Disney plus subscription. Until today, I will never in my house have a Disney plus subscription again. Now that I know that my children were actively being groomed by Disney to hold a secret from me as her dad and to confide in some other random male counterpart as a result, and I ask you to join me, I hope that hashtag boycott Disney goes like wildfire around the internet.
Once this is found out, I cannot imagine that it. How else if, if this is not where you draw the line, where do you draw it? If it's not where they groom your child into believing that being assaulted and holding a secret from you is the norm, then what is it? What the fuck is it? If it's not that, what is it?
How does that not cause you to cancel your subscription? Right? I don't care. Stream it. I'll give you five websites to do it with. Stream it, but don't give 'em your money. We need to send a clear, clear picture to corporations like Disney that we are absolutely not going to continue to allow you to program our children.
For your disgustingly dark purposes.
Protect your children. Get them away from these programs that are actively grooming them, right? It is your job as a parent to mitigate risk if nothing else, right? Protect them, house them, feed them. Mitigate risk. If you have children and you decide to maintain a Disney plus subscription after finding this out, you got some soul search and to do, or you're just a complete optimist who, who does not live in a real world where more than 10% of young girls, 10% of girls in their lifetime will be assaulted.
And 94% of the time they will know the person that did it. That is a disgusting reality, and again, I wish they could have this theme and I wish they could push this all they want and not have it have a negative outcome and not have it be based in the fact that there's a very high like.  that your child will go through something and now think that it is acceptable to maintain that secrecy from you.
Right? And that's what you have to understand about programming, right? That's what you have to understand about the, the, the way that you, if it is nothing else, you take a young baby and that baby goes from having a blank slate, right? Just think of it like a, if you think of it from like a programming perspective, I don't know how to program, so maybe I'm talking outta my ass, but, but if you look at it from that perspective, you have to teach that child how to operate in this world, right?
You gotta put all of the, all of the zeros and the ones in there so that they know not to touch a hot fire, right? And some of that programming's built in, but some of it can be manipulated.  and it's not the ones that are completely built in that they're trying to manipulate. It's the ones that are susceptible to impression.
It's the ones that are like, Hey, they're family. Right? They're cool, they're hip. It's your uncle, not your dad or your mom. Right? Tell them your secrets about the boy you like. Tell them the secrets about the, the clothes your parents don't like you to wear. Tell them like, and again, this is not with the aunts, it's not even even playing field, it's not even like this was stumbled upon, and that's how you know that is how you know that this was intentional, is that it's not a consistent theme for men and women.
It is specifically uncles, specifically male mentor type figures that are being called out and utilized as a way to groom your children within these TV shows. Right? And I can look at, uh, several of those and know that some of them were something that my daughter was consuming and something that I consumed when I was growing up.
right? Something that probably you consumed when you were growing up. And this is not even getting into the movies. Not even getting into the movies, right? And we already have a very long list, right? And when you continue that out, you find more and more and more, right, like chat, G P T said 32, 40% of them.
So what are you gonna do with that information? Are you gonna leave here? Forget about it. Allow your child to watch some stupid ass show that's going to program them. Program them to keep secrets from you to believe that pronouns are a real thing. To think that men can have periods as long as they're wearing a trans shirt.
Like in Baymax. Is that what you want for your child? Or are you gonna take the, I don't know, three steps right now? To do so. Right? And let's see. Maybe I can do it right here. Let's, let's see if I can do it. Um, I'm going to log into Disney right now. It's gonna take me a sec. Gimme a sec here. Let's get this computer over here.
My daughter's gonna be happy about this. Let's log into Disney right now. I'll walk you through the steps. We're gonna go to disney plus.com, all right, Disney plus.com. All you gotta do, may I follow me along here? Disney plus.com if you have children, let's make this fun. Log in. I'm gonna put in my username.
Let's see how we do it. How hard do they make it? We're gonna go to, I assume, Go and click on your profile. Go to account, and at the very bottom there is a delete account button. Two steps log into Disney Press account. Third step press delete account.
If you wanna delete your Disney Plus account, you must cancel your subscription first, or you will continue to be charged. Deleting your Disney Plus account will delete your email address, first and last name and profile. It will also anonymize all other Disney plus account information so it is no longer associated with your email.
You'll also be unsubscribed from all marketing campaigns. Uh, if your Disney Plus subscription is bill by a third party, you proceed through the requested Disney plus account deletion. Then you immediately lose access. Look at this. They sent something to my email. They will give me a three digit.
Go log into my email.
Let's get that one time code. There it is, 6 0 5 16, and then some other number. Not sure why. I wouldn't care to tell you that. I'm not sure. You're trying to get into my Disney Plus subscription. And even if you are, have fun. Um, 6 0 5, 1 6
and delete. Just like that folks, three steps. Log into your account, click account, press delete. That's it, and you're done. I hope you followed me along there. All right. Now, on that note, do what's right for you. Do what's right for your family and damn it, do what is right for your children because nobody else is going to, in fact, almost everybody who is on the other side of that has your best, the best interest of your child, not in mind.
Whether it's a corporation, whether it's the government, whether it's a corporate entity, a, whatever it is, you are the only person who's gonna take that seriously, and your child's gonna either grow from it or suffer from it. So on that note, Whew, man. I gotta take a breath after that one. That pisses me off.
Thank you guys for listening. I appreciate it so much. I hope, I hope, hope, hope that you got something from that today. Going to be starting our first round of interviews over the next couple weeks and I am excited if you know somebody, uh, that should be interviewed, be happy to hear from him.
Um, please connect us if it is you, yourself, you have a great story. Whatever it is, reach out, , reach out on social media. , it's the Austin J. Adams basically everywhere on Instagram, on truth social, on my, just started new Twitter, which I got like nobody that follows me on yet. . So add over to Twitter, follow me.
The Austin J. Adams, um, backup account and the podcast account is the Adams. Uh, go head over to Austin adams.ck.com, sign up for the ck you'll get all of the articles, links, videos, podcast, video, podcast, all of it to your email, along with weekly emails about the topics that we're discussing in full length detail.
And that's what I got. All right, hit subscribe. Leave a five star review and to love you. Have a great week.
 
 

Modern Dystopia: 15 Minute Cities & Wuhan Lab Admissions

In this episode, we dive deep into the wildest and craziest news of the week. From Steven Seagal receiving an award from Vladimir Putin to the Mexican President's sighting of an elf from the Mayan subculture, we discuss it all.
But that's just the beginning. We also explore the Department of Energy's recent admission that the Wuhan Lab of Virology was the source of the coronavirus, a topic that has been at the forefront of global discussions for the past year.
Finally, we take a closer look at the World Economic Forum's 15-minute cities plan and the growing pushback against it. What is a 15-minute city, and why are some calling it a terrible authoritarian project? We cover all the details and what it means for us moving forward.
Join us for a thought-provoking and informative conversation on the latest news and events that are shaping our world. 

Toxic Trains, UFO Threats, and Epstein’s List: The Uncovered Truth

In this explosive episode, we dive deep into the craziest string of events that we have witnessed in our lifetime. From the shocking train derailment in Ohio that caused a radioactive mushroom cloud, to the two other derailments in Texas and North Carolina carrying toxic chemicals that the media is barely covering.
But that's not all. We also explore the four unidentified flying objects that have been shot down by the Biden administration, including one that was over Lake Michigan and evaded the first missile strike. Is this the government hiding the truth about extraterrestrial life, or is there something else going on here?
We also examine the recent discussions surrounding Epstein's list being released, as well as other topics that have been hidden from the public eye. The coincidence between a movie that was recently released and the Ohio train derailment raises many questions and fuels conspiracy theories. We bring you the facts and let you decide.
 
Subscribe and leave a 5-star review!

Indoctrination Nation: The Dark Side of School Systems | Satanic Grammys | J.K Rowling Under Fire | Chinese Spy Balloons |

Welcome to a journey down the rabbit hole of modern society. In this podcast, we dive into the controversial and often overlooked topics that impact our daily lives. From the rising threat of Chinese spy balloons to the ongoing J.K Rowling/ Harry Potter Video Game controversy, we examine the facts and challenge popular beliefs. We also shed light on how industrialized school systems may be indoctrinating future generations and explore the dark side of the music industry with the recent "satanic" Grammy performance by pop artist Sam Smith. Join us as we uncover the truth and spark thought-provoking discussions around current events. 
 
Subscribe and leave a 5-star review!

Battle Royale: Crowder vs The Daily Wire | Alec Baldwin vs Manslaughter | Greta Thornburg vs Reality

Join Red Pill Revolution for an explosive episode as we dive deep into the truth behind the headlines and expose the lies and manipulation of mainstream media. Covering the most controversial and talked-about topics of the week, including Alec Baldwin's charges of involuntary manslaughter, Greta Thunberg's arrest, a controversy surrounding an NHL hockey player under fire for refusing to wear a lgbtq+ jersey, a feud between conservative entertainers Stephen crowder and the daily wire, and finally Jamie Lee Curtis's disturbing art display. Get ready for a wild ride.
 
Subscribe and leave a 5-star review!

The Triangle of Terror: Russia’s UFO Showdown, Mexico’s Drug War Inferno, and the Rise of Kevin McCarthy as Speaker of the House

In this explosive episode of Red Pill Revolution, we dive deep into the strange and shocking events unfolding around the world. First, we investigate the shocking reports of Russia shooting down a UFO, raising questions about extraterrestrial life and the military's role in defending against it. Next, we examine the brutal attacks by the Sinaloa cartel against the Mexican military and government, and the impact this has on the stability of the region. Finally, we take a close look at Kevin McCarthy's rise to the position of Speaker of the House, and what this means for the future of American politics. Buckle up, because this is one wild ride you won't want to miss.
Subscribe and leave a 5-star review!

The Dark Side of Self-Help: Exposing Fake Gurus and Finding Real Solutions for Your New Year’s Resolutions

Are you looking to make positive changes in your life this new year but feeling overwhelmed by all the self-help options out there? Join us for an eye-opening episode about the dark side of the self-help industry and how to avoid falling prey to fake gurus. We'll share practical tips for setting and achieving your new year's resolutions and help you navigate the crowded world of self-improvement to find genuine solutions for your personal growth. Tune in for a thought-provoking and informative episode on the power of self-help and the importance of being discerning in your journey to betterment.
 
Subscribe and leave a 5-star review!

Artificial Baby Factories & Nuclear Fusion | Congress Introduces TikTok Ban

This week's episode discusses a concept unveiled for the world's first artificial womb facility, aka a baby factory where you can create a designer baby leading to a discussion of all of the horrific dystopian realities this could create. We also discuss the recent scientific win of creating net-positive nuclear fusion and what that could lead to. Lastly, we discuss the recently proposed ban on Tiktok by congress.
 
Subscribe and leave a 5-star review!

FBI Infiltrates Twitter & Zeleskyy Time’s Person of the Year

In this week's episode, we discuss Time's person of the year being awarded to President of Ukraine Zelenskyy; the ongoing twitter files release showing how the FBI had infiltrated Twitter, and all of the censorship issues during the election over the Hunter Biden Laptop. We also discuss how the Biden administration essentially gave the Saudi Crown Prince amnesty for the murder of Jamal Kashoggi.
 
Subscribe and leave a 5-star review!